Ethical Questions Arising from A Psychiatrist Suicide
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Questions Arising from a Proto-Neural Cognitive Architecture
A neural cognitive architecture would be an architecture based on simulated neurons, that provided a set of mechanisms for all cognitive behaviour. Moreover, this would be compatible with biological neural behaviour. As a result, such architectures can both form the basis of a fully-fledged AI and help to explain how cognition emerges from a collection of neurons in the human brain. The develop...
متن کاملEthical suicide research: a survey of researchers.
Research is needed to better understand and respond effectively to people who are suicidal. Involving people who are suicidal in research poses some ethical and pragmatic problems. The ethical problems and difficulties in obtaining approval to involve people who are suicidal in research has contributed to the current paucity of research that explores the suicidal experience. To explore some of ...
متن کاملQuestions arising from the Parliament of the World's Religions
The Parliament of the World's Religions was held in Chicago (29 August-4th September 1993) as a centennial celebration of a similar event in Chicago in 1893. This came to be seen by many as the birth of the inter-faith movement despite its origins as an official extension of an event organized by the City of Chicago to commemorate the Fourth Centenary of the arrival of Columbus in the Americas....
متن کاملAre psychiatrist characteristics associated with postdischarge suicide of schizophrenia patients?
Information on the relationship between characteristics of mental healthcare providers, including hospitals and psychiatrists, and postdischarge suicide is scanty. This study aims to identify the risk factors for suicide among schizophrenia patients in the 3-month postdischarge period. The study cohort comprised all patients with a principal diagnosis of schizophrenia discharged from psychiatri...
متن کاملEthical questions about peer review.
SIR Your editorial in the March 1992 issue (1), is in my opinion something of a landmark and a positive, favourable one in the history of scholarly communication. In effect, you are urging the medical research community to take seriously a paper that leading peer review authorities rejected (for one reason or another) for publication. The peer review authority rejection might be characterised a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psychology and Psychotherapy Research Study
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2639-0612
DOI: 10.31031/pprs.2018.02.000533